In
pursuing my teaching credential, I had numerous professors reference something
called 'social justice'. Although I had studied numerous reading assignments that
refer to this topic, there was no clear, constant definition. None-the-less,
this 'social justice' thing is obviously an emphasis in schools so perhaps it deserves a little scrutiny here.
It's
a little trite for some pompous 'educational theorist' to come out in favor of
'social justice'. I think we can assume that all reasonable people support
justice, just as all normal people favor goodness and niceness. So why do educators
insist on making these empty proclamations on how they believe in social
justice?
Just what is 'social justice', and why
do people insist on using this phrase when the word 'justice' should suffice? I
know what the word 'social' means, and I know what the words 'justice' means. Put
these words together and you have a phrase that takes on completely new, and amorphous
meaning. Perhaps the semantics are deliberately
vague so it can mean anything to anyone. That way none can object to it. One
definition found on the internet states that: "Social justice generally refers to the idea
of creating a society or institution that is based on the principles of
equality and solidarity, that understands and values human rights, and that
recognizes the dignity of every human being". 1
Sounds
great, but it's not exactly novel. I think America's constitution covered that ground centuries ago.
A great deal of thought and effort was made to insure liberty and justice for
all. We even have a federal agency called the 'Department of Justice'.
One of the most influential 'educational
theorist' of modern times was a Marxist named Paolo Freire. Freire advocated
that all teachers proselytize his particular brand of 'social justice', stating
that: “There is no such thing as a
neutral education process.”2 Freire
believed that his social justice agenda should be incorporated into every
subject. An example of a math problem that Freire
might approve could look like this: If there are 16 exploitive
capitalists in the room and 23 enlightened progressives, then what is the ratio
of capitalist exploiter to enlightened progressive?
America's
traditional notion of 'justice' entails
respect for property rights. Freire's notion of 'social justice' does not. Tragically,
innumerable educational professors who refer to Freire as a guru. Personally, I
found his opus 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed' so tedious that I felt that I was
the one being oppressed by being required to read it. If you have a masochistic
bent, then read it for yourself and you will see what I mean.
In
practice, 'social justice' is simply a euphemism for the redistribution of
wealth. That is the not-too-subtle message that I gleaned from the
credentialing program. I believe there is a hidden agenda in many schools to promote
socialist, activist teachers, who in turn churn out little semi-literate socialists,
activists, community organizing students. I find it sadly ironic that so many
teachers can't teach kids to read or do arithmetic, yet they presume full
authority to re-make society.
Any
modification of 'justice' is uncalled
for. America's founding fathers outlined a formula for social justice far
superior to anything Paolo Freire, or any
other 'educational theorist' could envision. Our founding fathers understood
that justice springs from liberty. These enlightened men also realized that
there is no justice without freedom, and there is no freedom without a
free market and property rights.
I
would strongly recommend to parents that if the neighborhood school features activist
teachers that proselytize 'social
justice', then pull their kids out. Children don't need this kind of social
agenda being forced down their impressionable little throats. Instead, find an
alternative school where teachers emphasize good old fashioned history, reading,
writing, and arithmetic. A true appreciation of justice will surely follow.
1. Education and Social Justice, J. Zajda, S. Majhanovich, V. Rust,
2006
2 The Pedagogy of The
Oppressed, Paolo
Freire, 1968
No comments:
Post a Comment
blog comment